Since Oregon's Death With Dignity Act passed, there has not been an abuse of physician-assisted suicide, in fact, in 2001, less than one half of a percent of deaths from terminal illnesses or similar diseases in Oregon were a result from physician-assisted suicide with the Death With Dignity Act (Ferguson 78).For that reason, it can clearly be seen that physician-assisted suicide being legalized in Oregon has not lead to abuse or excessive use of it.Derek Humphry talks about this in his article "Voluntary Euthanasia is Ethical" and he includes seven limitations of ethical euthanasia.Tags: Essays Online To Buy 10 Per PagesSolving Linear Word ProblemsSolving Problems With Absolute ValueWriting Claims In An EssayObjective Of A Research PaperEssays About Hamlet'S InsanityAp Essay FormatEssay On Environmental Issues And The Concept Of DevelopmentMoral Values Are Powerfully Affected ByEssay On A Contemporary Artist
The resources are wasted if they are used on people who no longer want them and can no longer be saved by those resources being used on them. "Voluntary Euthanasia is Ethical." Opposing Viewpoints: Euthanasia.
In various cases of withdrawing life support from people who cannot make the choice themselves, some people wanting a person on life support only wanted them on it for personal gain.
This process takes a while, so the patient has a lot of time to think through the ramifications of this act.
Ferguson in his book writes, "Legalization may be the best way to avoid the slide down the slippery slope" (79).
The Right to Die The right to die is by one definition, "The right of a terminally ill person to refuse life-sustaining treatment" (Ferguson 21).
Inextricably tied up with the right to die are the controversies of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.The debate over the right to die includes arguments over euthanasia and physician- assisted suicide. Ferguson, Jr., the author of a book titled The Right to Die, includes the definitions of the terms euthanasia and assisted suicide to help the reader better understand the differences between them and what they actually mean.Euthanasia is, "The act or practice of killing or bringing about the death of a person who suffers from an incurable disease or condition, especially a painful one, for reasons of mercy" (Ferguson 20).Having the option of physician-assisted suicide could lead to a more peaceful death for those suffering from terminal illnesses than a banning assisted suicide.In Humphry's article he wrote about a terminally ill man considering assisted suicide, "Now that he had the knowledge and the drugs, with control and choice in his grasp, he had negotiated new terms with himself concerning his fate" (n. Terminally ill people would fight longer if they knew they had the option to kill themselves and knew how it could be done (Humphry n. Having options makes it easier to fight because a person would know there is always another way if it gets too difficult to go on.Also dealing with the right to die is life support.Though everyone's life is valuable, people who are terminally ill should have more options available so they can deal with their end-of-life decisions in whatever manner they choose or would want without being judged publicly by it.These rules would make it possible to help end the lives of those who are terminally ill, while not ending them impulsively or without out the consent of the patient.In the United States, Oregon has passed the Death With Dignity Act allowing physician-assisted suicide in the cases of terminally ill patients.Having the option of physician assisted suicide with right to die laws is something many support.According to Pew Research Center poll material in the book The Right to Die, eighty-four percent of people polled support right to die laws (Ferguson 54).