spokesman John Collingwood said that a check of the bureau’s records showed that “the shorter-barreled rifle was among the weapons tested.” Danforth’s response was pretty much, Well, if you say so. In 1996 he was the relentless Javert who came down so hard on an Atlanta security guard, Richard Jewell, over the Olympic Games bombing. Even as he sent out for a new hair shirt (Opus Dei members mortify the flesh) and gave the order to build a new guillotine, the F. The structure of the reports seems designed to confuse the reader rather than help him.” Dr.
It is hard to recall an administration in which it was not the center of grave scandal.”Freeh himself seems addicted to dull sharp practices. lab was found to have routinely bungled investigations (read by J. Professor Brian Caddy, after a study of the lab’s findings: “If these reports are the ones to be presented to the courts as evidence then I am appalled by their structure and information content.
Finally, during a six-hour assault, the building was set fire to and then bulldozed by Bradley armored vehicles. From the beginning, it was ordained that Mc Veigh was to have no coherent motive for what he had done other than a Shakespearean motiveless malignity. I had been told that Diane Sawyer would be questioning me from New York, but ABC has a Mc Veigh “expert,” one Charles Gibson, and he would do the honors. ” Dutifully, I told, briefly, how it was that Mc Veigh, whom I had never met, happened to invite me to be one of the five chosen witnesses to his execution. seizures of property without due process of law, warrantless raids and murders committed against innocent people by various drug-enforcement groups, government collusion with agribusiness’s successful attempts to drive small farmers out of business, and so on. Personally, I was sufficiently outraged to describe in detail what had actually happened. Like so many of his interchangeable TV colleagues, he is in place to tell the viewers that former senator John Danforth had just concluded a 14-month investigation of the F. When, after four minutes, he was officially dead, his eyes were still open, staring into the ceiling camera that was recording him “live” for his Oklahoma City audience. Among Henley’s numerous writings was a popular anthology called (1892), about those who had done selfless heroic deeds.
denied ever shooting off anything much more than a pyrotechnic tear-gas cannister. It was a great victory for Uncle Sam, as intended by the F. There was to be only one story: one man of incredible innate evil wanted to destroy innocent lives for no reason other than a spontaneous joy in evildoing. One disgusted juror said, “The wrong people were on trial.” Show Time! Along with other protesters, he was duly photographed by the F. Always the survivalist, he seemed to ration his remaining breaths.
The Branch Davidians, as the cultists called themselves, were a peaceful group of men, women, and children living and praying together in anticipation of the end of the world, which started to come their way on February 28, 1993. The first letter to me was appreciative of what I had written. To show what an eager commercialite I am—hardly school of Capote—I kept no copies of my letters to him until the last one in May. As to your letter, I fully recognize that “the general rebellion against what our gov’t has become is the most interesting (and I think important) story in our history this century.” This is why I have been mostly disappointed at previous stories attributing the OKC bombing to a simple act of “revenge” for Waco—and why I was most pleased to read your Nov. In the 4 years since the bombing, your work is the first to really explore the underlying motivations for such a strike against the U. Although I have many observations that I’d like to throw at you, I must keep this letter to a practical length—so I will mention just one: if federal agents are like “so many Jacobins at war” with the citizens of this country, and if federal agencies “daily wage war” against those citizens, then should not the OKC bombing be considered a “counter-attack” rather than a self-declared war?
The Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, exercising its mandate to “regulate” firearms, refused all invitations from cult leader David Koresh to inspect his licensed firearms. The second letter from his Colorado prison is dated “28 Feb 99.” “Mr. I received your book United States last week and have since finished most of Part 2—your political musings.” I should say that spelling and grammar are perfect throughout, while the handwriting is oddly even and slants to the left, as if one were looking at it in a mirror. Would it not be more akin to Hiroshima than Pearl Harbor? I wrote in these pages: For Timothy Mc Veigh, [Waco and Ruby Ridge] became the symbol of [federal] oppression and murder. Meanwhile, conflicting details about him accumulate—a bewildering mosaic, in fact—and he seems more and more to have stumbled into the wrong American era. But then “why” is a question the Media are trained to shy away from. One might actually learn why something had happened and become thoughtful. He did not complain about his fate; took responsibility for what he was thought to have done; did not beg for mercy as our always sadistic Media require. Followed by a 51-day siege in which loud music was played 24 hours a day outside the compound. Apparently, he was making and selling crystal meth; he was also—what else in these sick times? The new attorney general, Janet Reno, then got tough. Abolition of slavery or preservation of the Union would have been more worthy of his life than anger at our corrupt secret police. When, after four minutes, hewas officially dead, his eyes were still open, staring into the camera recording him “live.”There was a standoff. Meanwhile, the Media were briefed regularly on the evils of David Koresh. When, at last, she rose to her feet the bird remained on her arm—consolation? Mencken put it, “[The Department of Justice] has been engaged in sharp practices since the earliest days and remains a fecund source of oppression and corruption today. There was to be only one story: one man of incredible innate evil wanted to destroy innocent lives for no reason other than a spontaneous joy in evildoing. Kelly and Wearne, in their investigation of its lab work, literally a life-and-death matter for those under investigation, quote two English forensic experts on the subject of the Oklahoma City bombing. Freeh’s deranged charges against the blameless Los Alamos scientist were thrown out of court by an enraged federal judge who felt that the F. Our government’s secret police, with its allies, put a heavy fist upon the scales. I., the more one realizes that it is a very dangerous place indeed. CNN gave us bits and pieces of Mc Veigh’s last morning. Incidentally, the inexorable beatification of Harry Truman is now an important aspect of our evolving imperial system. But hewas stuck where he was and he declared war on a government that he felt had declared war on its own people. Mc Veigh had also noted that Harry Truman had never said that he was sorry about dropping two atomic bombs on an already defeated Japan, killing around 200,000 people, mostly collateral women and children. But Mc Veigh considered himself, rightly or wrongly, at war, too. More to the point, he and the prosecution agreed that he had no serious accomplices. Since Mc Veigh had been revealed as evil itself, no one was interested in why he had done what he had done. Suddenly I heard him say, “We’re having trouble with the audio.” Then he pulled the plug that linked ABC and me. Characteristically, no talking head mentioned Henley’s name, because no one knew who he was. One irritable woman described Henley as “a 19th-century cripple.” I fiercely E-mailed her network: the one-legged Henley was “extremities challenged.”The stoic serenity of Mc Veigh’s last days certainly qualified him as a Henley-style hero. Iago is now back in town, with a bomb, not a handkerchief. Our interview would be something like four minutes. This means that only every other question starts with “Now, tell us, briefly . Briefly, it all began in the November 1998 issue of I had written a piece about “the shredding of our Bill of Rights.” I cited examples of I. (For those who would like further evidence of a government running amok, turn to page 397 of my ) Then, as a coda, I discussed the illegal but unpunished murders at Ruby Ridge, Idaho (a mother and child and dog had been killed in cold blood by the F. Meanwhile, the card players of 1998 were busy shuffling and dealing. He just cut you off.” So, in addition to the governmental shredding of Amendments 4, 5, 6, 8, and 14, Mr. Mc Veigh made no final statement, but he had copied out, it appeared from memory, “Invictus,” a poem by W. I doubt if Mc Veigh ever came across it, but he would, no doubt, have identified with a group of young writers, among them Kipling, who were known as “Henley’s young men,” forever standing on burning decks, each a master of his fate, captain of his soul.