People who receive poor or no medical care are sometimes healthy; others who receive the very best medical care die.In considering medical care as a right, then, one basis for determining how much of it should be available to members of society might be equity.Although responsibility for arranging for treatment theoretically might be assigned to the family of the person in ill health, the practical reality is that high-cost treatment is inaccessible to most families. S., health insurance—for those covered by it—is employer-based.Tags: Random Assignment In ResearchEssays On The Nightmare Before ChristmasSocial Research Proposal SampleEasy Research Paper Topics CollegeCollege Essay Help In Bay AreaPaid To Write Term PapersTerm Papers On Persuasion
The amount of cash raised falls short of the mark, and time is running out.
Prompted by his wife's plea that he "do something," John Q arrives at the hospital Emergency Department ready for action.
Free public education up to grade 12 is provided for those who wish to attend and because of its importance, it is mandatory up to age 16.
When medical care is seen from that perspective, public policy would have to determine the limits of "basic medical care." What would be comparable to "grade 12"?
Paying for services as individuals (private pay) becomes unrealistic for any but the wealthiest in society.
In the absence of a national health care program, the options for payment for services are therefore reduced to employer-paid health insurance and government programs for the indigent.For movie watchers able to suspend their disbelief, identify with the human dynamics of the story, and tolerate a one-sided caricature of health care—particularly with respect to HMOs—John Q provides suspenseful entertainment.In response to its absence of thoughtful critique on the shortcomings of the of the U. health care delivery system (arguably, not the task of this movie), viewers may wish to consider the central issue of the movie from a more ordered perspective. The purpose of this reflection is to provide a more nuanced context for viewers who want to think in greater depth about family responsibility for health care.If we view it as a right, then health care can be thought of as analogous to public education.In that case, each citizen has the right to a certain amount of education/ medical care.An equity approach relies on the judgment that the system would be fair or equitable if criteria based on individual need determined the amount of care available to each citizen (Aday, Begley, Lairson, & Slater, 1998).Although many complex ethical issues arise from these thoughts, the core idea appeals strongly to common sense: Different people have differing medical needs.What consumers want is health; what is available is medical care.There is no way to avoid or completely control the risk that medical care, even when delivered flawlessly, may not result in health.This work is protected by copyright and may be linked to without seeking permission.Permission must be received for subsequent distribution in print or electronically. For more information, read Michigan Publishing's access and usage policy. The author explores the public perception of current U. health care, the distinction between medical care and health, and the ethics of health care decisions.