In this regard, it is also worth noting that the interview is a highly regarded genre in French intellectual circles and is often used by scholars to introduce major clarifications and/or qualifications of earlier work, as well as to outline plans for works in progress. Contemporary Studies in Philosophy and the Human Sciences series.
In the English-speaking world, , is transdisciplinary, its impact has been impressively broad.
In this chapter, Foucault, in a retrospective mood, attempts to explain the evolution of his theory of power.
In the first of these lectures, he outlines the breakup after World War II of all the totalizing political and ideological systems dating from the Enlightenment.
Disciplines as diverse as historiography, philosophy, political theory, geography, art history, literary criticism, sociology, and linguistics all have practitioners whose research and teaching reflect the influence of Foucault’s powerful adaptation of Nietzsche’s genealogical mode of analysis. This book contains essays on Michel Foucault presented in 1985, the year after Foucault’s death, at a conference sponsored by the Institute for the Humanities of the University of Illinois at Chicago.
The influence of has been especially evident among British and American literary critics.
Now discourse is but one among an array of social practices that may all be understood as matrices of power.
Finally, in the last years of his life, Foucault did not so much abandon the genealogical method as adapt it for political and moral purposes.
is a loosely related collection of writings and interviews that cover a crucial transitional period in Michel Foucault’s development as a thinker and theorist of power—his enduring theme.
Three distinct periods can be discerned in his work.