Tolstoy wrote in a letter to Afanasy Fet that what he has written in War and Peace is also said by Schopenhauer in The World as Will and Representation.However, Tolstoy approaches "it from the other side." The first draft of the novel was completed in 1863.
Tolstoy wrote in a letter to Afanasy Fet that what he has written in War and Peace is also said by Schopenhauer in The World as Will and Representation.However, Tolstoy approaches "it from the other side." The first draft of the novel was completed in 1863.Tags: Hiv Aids Research PaperResearch Paper Citation StylesWeb Courseworks Ltd Madison WiEssay Writing For AdvertisingSample Executive Summary Of A Business PlanPeanut Butter Business PlanClothcraft DesynthesisEssay On Car And Vehicle PollutionDecision That Changed Your Life Essay
Tolstoy was critical of standard history, especially military history, in War and Peace.
He explains at the start of the novel's third volume his own views on how history ought to be written.
The first half of the book was written under the name "1805".
During the writing of the second half, he read widely and acknowledged Schopenhauer as one of his main inspirations.
Roughly the first half is concerned strictly with the fictional characters, whereas the latter parts, as well as the second part of the epilogue, increasingly consist of essays about the nature of war, power, history, and historiography.
Tolstoy interspersed these essays into the story in a way that defies previous fictional convention.
) is a novel by the Russian author Leo Tolstoy, published serially, then in its entirety in 1869.
It is regarded as a central work of world literature and one of Tolstoy's finest literary achievements.
The novel chronicles the French invasion of Russia and the impact of the Napoleonic era on Tsarist society through the stories of five Russian aristocratic families.
Portions of an earlier version, titled The Year 1805, Tolstoy said War and Peace is "not a novel, even less is it a poem, and still less a historical chronicle." Large sections, especially the later chapters, are philosophical discussion rather than narrative.