Tags: Business Plan Format FreeMr Imaging Of The Postoperative Knee A Pictorial EssayCpm Algebra 2 Homework HelpCritical Thinking Activities For College StudentsMake Money Doing HomeworkRichard Wagner Judaism In Music And Other Essays
For example, a female DNA donor would be the clone's genetic twin, rather than mother, complicating the genetic and social relationships between mother and child as well as the relationships between other family members and the clone.
The World Council of Churches, representing nearly 400 Christian denominations worldwide, opposed cloning of both human embryos and whole humans in February 2006.
The United Methodist Church opposed research and reproductive cloning in May 2000 and again in May 2004.
Perspectives on human cloning are theoretical, as human therapeutic and reproductive cloning are not commercially used; animals are currently cloned in laboratories and in livestock production.
Advocates support the development of therapeutic cloning in order to generate tissues and whole organs to treat patients who otherwise cannot obtain transplants, to avoid the need for immunosuppressive drugs, and to stave off the effects of aging.
The prominent Qatari scholar Yusuf Al Qaradawi believes that cloning specific parts of the human body for medical purposes is not prohibited in Islam, but cloning the whole human body would not be permitted under any circumstances.
On the issue of animal ethics he takes a more lenient position.In bioethics, the ethics of cloning refers to a variety of ethical positions regarding the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning.While many of these views are religious in origin, some of the questions raised by cloning are faced by secular perspectives as well.The Islamic Fiqh Academy, in its Tenth Conference proceedings, which was convened in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia in the period from June 28, 1997 to July 3, 1997, issued a Fatwā stating that human cloning is haraam (sinful).Cloned-animal products were said to be indistinguishable from the non-cloned animals.Yes, that is a valid argument, but tampering with life is not something I want scientists interfering with.It is not our place as humans to create and destroy life.I believe that if we were capable of pro-longing everyone's life we would then overcrowd the earth because as bad as it may sound we need people to pass on as a form of population control.(Something else) then makes an argument for reproductive cloning saying when it becomes safe to perform that it will prevent the transmission of genetic diseases. How many possible lives will have to be lost before reproductive cloning is considered safe?Such cells, tissues, and organs would neither trigger an immune response nor require the use of immunosuppressive drugs.Both basic research and therapeutic development for serious diseases such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes, as well as improvements in burn treatment and reconstructive and cosmetic surgery, are areas that might benefit from such new technology. Appel of New York University, has gone so far as to argue that "children cloned for therapeutic purposes" such as "to donate bone marrow to a sibling with leukemia" may someday be viewed as heroes.